Write Review | Register | Login
  • Home
  • Solar Companies
  • Solar Panels
  • Inverter
  • Battery
  • Solar Panel Cost
  • Your Utility
  • Tesla
  • Blog
  • Solar Calculator
  • For Installers
  • Register
  • Login
  • CONSUMER
  • COMPANY

Read Reviews

Solar Calculator

Login | Register

Solar Leads

Upload Systems

Login | Register

Register to get live solar prices from the best rated solar companies in your area

Register to get live solar prices from the best rated solar companies in your area

Preparing solar calculator...


  1. Home
  2. SolarReviews News - Solar Energy and Solar News
  3. Top 5 Legislative Issues for 2015, According to AEE
Top 5 Legislative Issues for 2015, According to AEE

Top 5 Legislative Issues for 2015, According to AEE

by Chris Meehan on 12/22/2015 in Alternative Energy, Renewable Energy, Solar Energy, Solar Licensing, Solar Power, Solar Rebates

Anyone will agree it’s been an interesting year for clean energy. Prices continued to fall, incentives expired, were set to expire and most recently, some of the most important were extended just last week at the federal level. Now, at the state level, Advanced Energy Economy (AEE) offers it’s top 5 legislative issues for renewable energy for 2015—for better or for worse.  

Starting with the most negative impact on solar policies is AEE’s number 3 “North Carolina Scraps Solar Tax Credits.” North Carolina is the biggest solar state in the southeast and among one of the U.S.’s biggest solar states in terms of amount of solar installed and under construction. But this year Americans for Prosperity, the American Legislative Exchange Council were able to convince the North Carolina to let its renewable energy and energy efficiency standard (REPS) expire. Wind and solar farms. Courtesy NREL

“The tax credits were part of the larger, very contentious debate over the state budget, and were not extended past their expiration date at the end of this year,” AEE said. “As a result, the only projects qualifying for the tax credit this year are those with ‘the minimum percentage of the physical construction of the project constructed’ by the end of this 2015, setting off a flurry of 11th-hour solar construction in order to qualify, but with the future unclear.” This means the future of solar and renewable energy in The Tarheel State.

Next was a bit more murky, AEE’s number 2: “Michigan Debates its Energy Future.” Michigan’s Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS) is set for a sunset, AEE said. But the upper peninsula is likely to experience an energy capacity shortfall. As such energy policy has been one of the dominant themes of the 2015 legislative year—yet nothing’s been resolved. 

“We have hosted five lobby days with more than 120 legislative meetings to bring the advanced energy industry’s voice directly to the debate in Lansing,” AEE said. It added that it will take weeks or months for results to be realized. Legislation has been introduced to make the state’s renewable portfolio standard a voluntary goal but it would extend the Energy Optimization Standard to 2022. In Michigan now AEE and Mi-EIBC are fighting to improve the energy package. That includes tightening the language around the RPS goal, enabling market access for advanced energy firms via a competitive procurement process for new generation units, and ensuring that the energy efficiency agreements made in committee are adopted when the legislation comes to the House floor.

Ohio’s clean energy landscape was looking negative but that changed when Gov. Katich took action, putting it in AEE’s number 4 position: “Kasich Says ‘Not So Fast’ to Permanent Freeze.” The Republican-led legislature’s Energy Mandates Study Committee released a report on the future of the state’s renewable energy and energy efficiency mandates and recommended that the state make its two-year freeze on renewable energy and energy efficiency permanent.

Kasich interrupted the recommendations. “By calling extension of the freeze 'unacceptable,' he effectively shut down the legislative effort to do away with energy efficiency and renewable energy—at least for the time being,” AEE stated. Meanwhile Ohio’s FirstEnergy reached an agreement extending the production of its uncompetitive coal-fired power plants for another eight years. “No one knows how this will play out in the 2016 legislative session, but we do know that all parties will come to play in this high stakes game over Ohio’s energy future,” AEE said. “To that end, AEE and our state partner, Ohio Advanced Energy Economy, are busy preparing for the debate to resume in earnest after the New Year.”

AEE’s number 5 policy issue was more positive: “Victory for Energy Efficiency in Pennsylvania.” The state’s Public Utilities Commission released its Final Order on Phase III of Act 129, the state’s energy efficiency law. AEE said it and partners lobbied for the energy efficiency standards, which include extending the act for five years, returning demand response to its energy efficiency programs and expanding the Total Resource Cost test. The test “measures the cost-effectiveness of proposed programs by the utility, to recognize savings from reduced fossil fuel and water use,” AEE explained.

“With this victory for energy conservation, Pennsylvania can build upon the $231 million in savings from 2014, as the Commonwealth can expect to save 6.6 million megawatt hours of electricity over the five-year life of Phase III,” AEE said. “Continuing this program will also be a win for Pennsylvania’s economy, providing market certainty for a segment of the advanced energy industry that currently employs 57,000 people at more than 4,200 companies.”

AEE and its partners’ biggest victory, it’s number 1 was in California: “California Goes Even Bigger on Advanced Energy.” In January Gov. Jerry Brown said he would extend and expand the Golden State’s climate and energy goals. That included expanding the state’s RPS to 50 percent by 2030as well as increasing building efficiency and reducing petroleum usage by 50 percent. “The legislation passed on September 11, at the very end of the legislative session, minus the reduction in petroleum use, after ferocious pushback from oil interests,” AEE said. 

Given that only one of these issues was totally negative for the renewable energy industries and the Republican-led federal Congress supported renewable energy with the extensions of the Investment Tax Credit for solar and Production Tax Credit for wind it’s been a good year for clean energy. Looking ahead into 2016 and 2017 there will continue to be battles but at the moment, organizations like AEE and the public are fighting for clean energy and making progress on most fronts. 

Tweet

You must be Signed in to leave a Comment

To Sign in click this link: Click here to Sign in

If you have not yet registered on the site then you can Click here to register as a new user or Click here to register as an installer

Find what you want

Search through the posts

Never Miss a Post

Subscribe to Solar Review's News:

Write for Solar Reviews

Have content you would like to contribute?

Email us using the Contact Us link above, we would love to hear from you.

Categories

  • Alternative Energy (1016)
  • Inverters (58)
  • Photovoltaic Technology (611)
  • Renewable Energy (1570)
  • Solar Cells (293)
  • Solar Energy (2283)
  • Solar Licensing (235)
  • Solar Panels (1498)
  • Solar Power (2091)
  • Solar Rebates (1124)

Archives

  • February 2019 (11)
  • January 2019 (23)
  • December 2018 (21)
  • November 2018 (22)
  • October 2018 (23)
  • September 2018 (18)
  • August 2018 (23)
  • July 2018 (22)
  • June 2018 (21)
  • May 2018 (23)
  • April 2018 (21)
  • March 2018 (22)
  • February 2018 (21)
  • January 2018 (22)
  • December 2017 (20)
  • November 2017 (21)
  • October 2017 (25)
  • September 2017 (40)
  • August 2017 (65)
  • July 2017 (58)
  • June 2017 (66)
  • May 2017 (65)
  • April 2017 (58)
  • March 2017 (66)
  • February 2017 (57)
  • January 2017 (61)
  • December 2016 (62)
  • November 2016 (65)
  • October 2016 (62)
  • September 2016 (55)
  • August 2016 (53)
  • July 2016 (56)
  • June 2016 (53)
  • May 2016 (44)
  • April 2016 (30)
  • March 2016 (23)
  • February 2016 (20)
  • January 2016 (18)
  • December 2015 (22)
  • November 2015 (17)
  • October 2015 (19)
  • September 2015 (19)
  • August 2015 (12)
  • July 2015 (21)
  • June 2015 (22)
  • May 2015 (21)
  • April 2015 (20)
  • March 2015 (21)
  • February 2015 (18)
  • January 2015 (20)
  • December 2014 (18)
  • November 2014 (22)
  • October 2014 (20)
  • September 2014 (21)
  • August 2014 (15)
  • July 2014 (23)
  • June 2014 (20)
  • May 2014 (24)
  • April 2014 (24)
  • March 2014 (28)
  • February 2014 (26)
  • January 2014 (23)
  • December 2013 (24)
  • November 2013 (26)
  • October 2013 (34)
  • September 2013 (30)
  • August 2013 (29)
  • July 2013 (36)
  • June 2013 (47)
  • May 2013 (59)
  • April 2013 (44)
  • March 2013 (22)
  • February 2013 (20)
  • January 2013 (8)

Enter your address to find out what tax credits
and other solar incentives your property is eligible for







per month

Next

The following system would zero out your power bill and the savings shown would be made over the life of the system

ESTIMATED
SYSTEM*

ESTIMATED
SAVINGS*


Now get live pricing!

How it works: When you enter your details we display a more detailed online estimate. We then seek live pricing from installers for the size of system you need. Live pricing data is an installer's most commercially sensitive information and so this is why we are required to validate your name, address and phone number. If we cannot validate this information your estimate will only include historical pricing from past installations.

 



Click here to add Comments



Number of Installers: 3   2   1   Historical Prices Only

* Estimates are based on standard costs for utility power and installations in your zipcode and may vary from the detailed estimate that you will receive once you enter your contact information below. Calculations are based on a 100% loan over 20 years, with a 25 year payback, 4.5% loan rate, and 3% per year inflation in electricity prices.

Quick Links

  • Home
  • Solar Companies
  • Solar Panels
  • Solar Inverters
  • Solar Batteries
  • Solar Panel Cost
  • Going Solar with Your Utility
  • Solar Leads

 

About Us

  • About SolarReviews
  • Testimonials
  • Staff
  • Authors
  • Contact Us

Learn More

  • Solar Incentives
  • Going Solar - FAQ's
  • Pros and Cons of Solar Energy
  • Tips for finding the right installer
  • Solar Licensing Requirements
  • How much energy...Solar generate
  • Solar Financing
  • Net Metering
  • Solar tax credit
  • Solar City PPA
  • Solar panel installation issues
  • How much do solar panels cost?
  • Solar panel system equipment
  • The pros and cons of solar energy
Login
Register

Solar News and Events

  • Solar Blog
  • Solar News
  • Press Releases

Our Industry Partners

  • SEIA
  • CALSSA
  • Nabcep
  • Solar Energy International

Compare Solar Calculators

  • Solar Estimate
  • Solar Calculator

Cities

  • Texas -> Houston City
  • California -> Los Angeles City
  • Indiana -> Evansville City
  • California -> San Diego City
  • Texas -> Austin City
  • California -> San Jose City
  • Arizona -> Phoenix City
  • Nevada -> Las Vegas City
  • Texas -> Killeen City
  • Washington -> Seattle City
  • Texas -> Dallas City
  • Texas -> San Antonio City
  • Florida -> St Petersburg City
  • Florida -> Saint Petersburg City
  • New York -> Staten Island City
  • Florida -> Orlando City
  • Florida -> Fort Myers City
  • California -> Temecula City
  • California -> Riverside City
  • California -> Rancho California City
  • California -> Santa Clarita City
  • California -> Fremont City
  • Arizona -> Gilbert City
  • Ohio -> Cincinnati City
  • Ohio -> Columbus City
  • New Mexico -> Albuquerque City
  • Indiana -> Darmstadt City
Solar Reviews | Consumer Reviews of Solar Companies, solar panels, Solar Installers and Solar Contractors
About us

Compare consumer reviews of solar companies, solar panels and solar inverters. Request a free solar estimate from the solar company that best fits your needs.

Call us +1 (844) 442-5029
Follow us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Sitemap
Copyright © 2012 - solarreviews.com. All rights reserved.
Close